Gun control just makes a peaceful population even more vulnerable, especially if we are talking about a woman that does not have a firearm. The disarmament not only leaves a less free population, but also leaves less safe.
And there is no individual freedom if the individual is forbidden to protect against possible physical attacks. Freedom and self-defense are fully indivisible concepts. Without the second there is the first.
Respect the right of each individual could have firearms is still the best security policy, as the facts listed below show. Already restrict, or even prohibit, the right of an individual to have a firearm leaves him with no effective defense against violent criminals or against a tyrannical government.click this post here!
Harvard University, which is nothing conservative, recently released a study that proves that the more weapons individuals of a nation has, the lower the crime is, especially when we think about women and a firearm. In other words, there is a strong positive correlation between more and less offenses weapons. This is exactly the opposite of what the media would have us believe.
The two sides of the discussion.
But the fact is that this correlation makes sense, and the reason is quite intuitive: no criminal would get shot. If the government of a country approving a disarming status, what he’s really doing is reducing the fear of criminals take a shot of honest citizens and workers, and increasing the confidence of these criminals to know that their potential victims – who obey the law – are unarmed.
Take a look at some interesting facts, worldwide, that prove that more weapons leave a safer population, especially when we talk about women getting their first firearm.
# 1 A study published by Harvard University – Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy – reports that countries that have more guns tend to have less crime.
# 2 Over the last 20 years, arms sales have skyrocketed in the US, but the homicide related to firearms have fallen 39 percent over the same period. Moreover, “other crimes related to firearms” plunged 69%.
# 3 According to the study from Harvard, the nine European countries that have the lowest gun ownership rates have homicide rates that, together, are three times higher than those of the other nine European countries with the highest ownership rate weapons.see http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/11/5/1434788/-Gun-stupid-hits-the-jackpot-The-week-America-accidentally-shot-anything-that-moved-GunFAIL-CLXIV for more details.
# 4 Almost all the massacres committed by misfits individuals in the United States since 1950 occurred in states that have strict gun control laws.
With one exception, all the mass killings in the US since 1950 occurred in places where citizens are prohibited from carrying weapons, especially women. However, Europe, despite its rigid gun control policy, introduced three of the six episodes of the worst massacres in schools.
# 5 The US is the world’s number one country in terms of per capita gun ownership, but are only in 28th position worldwide in terms of homicides committed by firearms per 100,000 people.
# 6 The rate of violent crime in the US was 757.7 per 100,000 people in 1992. In 2011, it dropped to 386.3 per 100,000 people. During this same period, the homicide rate fell from 9.3 per 100,000 to 4.7 per 100,000. During the same period, as stated above, arms sales soared.
# 7 Each year, approximately 200,000 women in the US use firearms to protect themselves from sexual crimes. That is why Women’s Firearm is so important.
# 8 In general, firearms are used at a rate 80 times greater to prevent crimes than to take lives.
# 9 The number of unintended fatalities caused by firearms fell 58% between 1991 and 2011.
# 10 Despite the extremely rigid anti firearm law in force in the United Kingdom, its violent crime rate is approximately 4 times the US. In 2009, there were 2,034 violent crimes per 100,000 population in the UK. That same year, there were only 466 violent crimes per 100,000 population in the US.
How many of those news you’ve seen in the mainstream media, which gives voice only those who kill instead of the Women’s Firearm buying opportunity to defend themselves?